1.22 Lakh Central Government Employees Choose UPS

A staggering 1.22 lakh Central government employees have formally opted to switch from the National Pension System (NPS) to the Unified Pension Scheme (UPS), utilizing a special one-time option provided by the government.

This mass migration, which involves over 122,000 employees, highlights the strong preference among a specific cohort of the workforce for the assured, defined benefits of the OPS over the market-linked returns of the NPS.

The move carries significant long-term fiscal implications for the Central government, which is already grappling with the rising costs of an aging workforce.

The sheer volume of applications underscores the emotional and financial security attached to the legacy pension system.

NPS to UPS Switch: Scheme Eligibility and Context

The special option was not available universally but was strictly limited to Central government employees whose recruitment process was initiated through advertisements or notifications released before January 1, 2004, but who formally joined the service after that date.

January 1, 2004, marked the official cut-off for the implementation of the NPS, making this cohort of employees fall into a grey area.

The government extended this one-time choice to correct this ambiguity and provide parity, recognizing that their selection process began under the older regime.

Departments such as Railways, Defence (Civilian), Posts, and various central armed police forces primarily concentrate the employees who opted for the OPS.

The Economic and Political Impact

The decision by over 1.22 lakh employees to revert to the OPS translates into a substantial, guaranteed financial liability for the government.

Unlike the NPS, where a fund manages government contributions and market returns determine payouts, the OPS requires the government to pay fixed pensions from the annual budget as an unfunded commitment.

This move intensifies the ongoing political debate regarding the sustainability of the OPS, which many state governments have also recently decided to re-adopt, raising concerns among economists and policymakers about the long-term fiscal health of the nation.

For the individual employee, the choice reflects a strong prioritization of guaranteed retirement income over the potentially higher, but riskier, returns offered by the NPS.

Note: We are also on WhatsApp, LinkedIn, and YouTube to get the latest news updates. Subscribe to our Channels. WhatsApp– Click Here, YouTube – Click Here, and LinkedIn– Click Here.